Order:
  1.  54
    Why Did Marx Declare the Revolution Permanent?Lars T. Lih - 2020 - Historical Materialism 28 (3):39-75.
    Why did Marx declare the revolution permanent? A careful examination of the celebrated passages from March 1850 in their immediate rhetorical context shows that he intended to affirm the tactical principles laid down earlier in the Communist Manifesto – as opposed to standard ‘anti-stagist’ interpretations that present the Permanenz locution of 1850 as a break with these principles. Among such principles: keeping eyes firmly fixed on the prize – the permanent final goal of a complete overhaul of society – is (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  30
    Lenin Disputed.Lars T. Lih - 2010 - Historical Materialism 18 (3):108-174.
    Critical discussion of Lenin’s What Is to Be Done? is hindered by a series of historical myths. Issues such as the following need to be studied more empirically and more critically: Did the attitudes of early readers of WITBD? reflect Lenin’s alleged ‘worry about workers’? Did the events of 1905 cause Lenin to renounce his earlier views about the workers and about party-organisation, giving rise to disputes with Bolshevik activists? Did either Lenin or Trotsky ever rethink and reject the ideological (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  3. Our Position is in the Highest Degree Tragic”: Bolshevik “Euphoria” in 1920.'.Lars T. Lih - 2007 - In Michael Haynes & Jim Wolfreys (eds.), History and Revolution: Refuting Revisionism. Verso.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  41
    The tasks of our times: Kautsky’s Road to Power in Germany and Russia.Lars T. Lih - 2018 - Studies in East European Thought 70 (2-3):121-140.
    Kautsky’s Road to Power was received in very different ways in Germany and Russia. In Germany, it earned Kautsky hostility from the trade-unionists on the right of the party and the radicals on the left. Later writers dismiss the book as preaching “revolutionary passivity.” In Russia, the Bolsheviks immediately seized on the book as an endorsement of specifically Bolshevik positions. After the war broke out, they used it to show that Kautsky was a renegade who did not live up to (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark